Resume Builder and Analyzer

  • Shrikanta Jogar Computer Science and Engineering Dept, Visvesvaraya Technological University Belagavi, Karnataka, INDIA
  • Naveen Malali Computer Science and Engineering Dept, Visvesvaraya Technological University Belagavi, Karnataka, INDIA
  • Syed Mirchoni Computer Science and Engineering Dept, Visvesvaraya Technological University Belagavi, Karnataka, INDIA
  • Divansab Harakuni Computer Science and Engineering Dept, Visvesvaraya Technological University Belagavi, Karnataka, INDIA
  • Pramod K Computer Science and Engineering Dept, Visvesvaraya Technological University Belagavi, Karnataka, INDIA
Keywords: ATS, artificial Intelligence, NLP.

Abstract

The increasing adoption of digital technologies in recruitment has fundamentally altered the way organizations evaluate job applications. With employers receiving large volumes of resumes for each vacancy, automated screening mechanisms have become essential for maintaining efficiency and consistency in the hiring process. Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) are now widely used to parse, filter, and rank resumes based on predefined criteria such as structural organization, keyword relevance, and alignment with job requirements. While these systems significantly reduce recruiter workload and accelerate shortlisting, they also contribute to the rejection of many qualified candidates whose resumes fail to meet automated evaluation standards rather than reflecting a lack of skills or experience.

A major challenge faced by job seekers is limited awareness of how ATS platforms interpret resume content. Conventional resume-writing practices often emphasize visual design and creative formatting, which may interfere with machine-based parsing. Elements such as complex layouts, nonstandard section headings, and insufficient keyword optimization can prevent ATS software from accurately extracting candidate information. As a result, resumes that are otherwise strong may be filtered out during the initial screening stage. This growing dependence on automated recruitment has created a demand for intelligent tools that assist candidates in producing resumes optimized for ATS evaluation while maintaining professional quality and clarity.

This paper presents the design and development of a Smart AI Resume Builder and Analyzer, a web-based platform intended to support structured resume creation and intelligent resume evaluation. The proposed system integrates resume generation, ATS-focused analysis, quantitative scoring, and personalized feedback within a unified framework. The resume builder component guides users through a standardized data entry process that captures personal details, educational background, professional experience, skills, certifications, and career objectives. This structured approach reduces formatting inconsistencies and ensures compliance with commonly accepted ATS-friendly resume layouts. Resumes generated by the system are exported in widely used formats such as PDF and DOCX to ensure compatibility with online job portals and recruitment platforms.

The analyzer component employs a hybrid evaluation strategy that combines rule-based assessment with Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing techniques. Rulebased analysis focuses on formatting simplicity, section ordering, header consistency, and structural compliance with ATS parsing constraints. AI-driven analysis examines resume content for keyword relevance, semantic similarity to target job descriptions, grammatical accuracy, readability, and overall coherence. The system produces objective metrics including ATS compatibility scores, keyword match percentages, and overall resume quality ratings, offering users clear insights into resume effectiveness.

A distinguishing feature of the proposed system is its emphasis on personalized and role-specific feedback. Instead of providing generic suggestions, the analyzer identifies missing or underrepresented skills, weak experience descriptions, and content gaps relative to selected job roles. Actionable recommendations are generated to help users revise and enhance their resumes in a targeted manner. The platform also provides a centralized dashboard that enables users to track resume versions, compare evaluation scores across iterations, and assess measurable improvements over time. This feedback loop supports continuous optimization and informed decisionmaking during the job application process.

To evaluate system performance, experimental testing was conducted using a dataset of sample resumes across multiple job profiles, including technical and entry-level roles. Each resume was analyzed before and after applying system-generated recommendations. The results indicate a substantial improvement in ATS compatibility scores, keyword relevance, and readability metrics following optimization. These findings suggest an increased likelihood of resumes successfully passing automated screening stages. User observations further indicated reduced time spent on resume preparation and greater confidence in job applications.

The proposed Smart AI Resume Builder and Analyzer offers a practical, accessible, and scalable solution for modern erecruitment challenges. By combining structured resume creation with intelligent analysis and transparent feedback, the system enhances resume quality and supports equitable participation in automated hiring processes. The platform is suitable for individual job seekers as well as institutional deployment in academic and training environments. Future enhancements include multilingual support, advanced ATS simulation, and integration with job portals to further strengthen job-role matching and employability outcomes.

References

[1] Y. Zhang, L. Chen, and M. Zhou, “Large language model–driven resume analysis for intelligent recruitment systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 21534–21549, 2025.
[2] A. Kumar, R. Singh, and P. Natarajan, “Explainable AI frameworks for automated resume screening and job matching,” IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 45–58, 2025.
[3] S. Mehta and J. Lee, “Semantic skill extraction and role alignment in AI-based recruitment platforms,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 238, pp. 121843, 2025.
[4] D. Brown, K. Müller, and H. Wang, “Fairness-aware applicant tracking systems for large-scale hiring,” ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1–24, 2025.
[5] P. Banerjee and A. Ghosh, “End-to-end intelligent resume parsing and evaluation using transformer models,” Information Processing & Management, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 103640, 2025.
[6] J. Smith and R. Allen, “Applicant tracking systems and automated resume screening in modern recruitment,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 45612–45624, 2018.
[7] L. Johnson, D. Harris, and P. White, “Artificial intelligence–driven resume evaluation and job-role matching,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 389–401, 2023.
[8] R. Singh and P. Verma, “Natural language processing techniques for resume analysis and skill extraction,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 102345– 102357, 2019.
[9] A. Kumar, “AI-enabled recruitment systems: Architecture, challenges, and opportunities,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 1482–1494, 2022.
[10] K. Patel and M. Shah, “Keyword optimization strategies for ATS-based resume filtering,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Data Science and Analytics, Bengaluru, India, 2022, pp. 112–118.
[11] T. Brown and J. Miller, “Semantic similarity analysis for resume–job description matching,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 45– 54, 2020.
[12] S. Li, Y. Zhang, and H. Chen, “Transformer-based text representation for recruitment recommendation systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 88421–88433, 2021.
[13] M. Zhou and Q. Wang, “Automated resume parsing using deep learning and NLP techniques,” IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 23–34, 2022.
[14] A. Gupta and S. Natarajan, “Explainable AI models for recruitment decision support,” IEEE Computer, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 68–77, 2023.
[15] P. Rodriguez, L. Martinez, and A. Gomez, “Evaluation metrics for AIbased hiring systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 141560–141572, 2020.
[16] D. Lee and K. Park, “Role-based skill recommendation using resume analytics,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 3054–3064, 2022.
[17] S. Chatterjee and R. Bose, “Bias and fairness issues in algorithmic recruitment,” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 28–37, 2021.
[18] J. Wang, H. Liu, and X. Sun, “Document classification techniques for resume categorization,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 112908–112919, 2019.
[19] N. Hassan and M. Ali, “Automated employability assessment using machine learning,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 129401–129413, 2021.
[20] K. Müller and S. Klein, “Design principles for ATS-compliant resume generation systems,” IEEE Software, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 56–64, 2022.
[21] R. Iyer and P. Kulkarni, “Rule-based versus AI-based resume screening: A comparative study,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Human– Computer Interaction, Hyderabad, India, 2021, pp. 221–228.
[22] F. Ahmed, S. Rahman, and T. Rahman, “Readability analysis of professional documents using NLP,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 176345– 176356, 2020.
[23] J. Kim and Y. Lee, “Career recommendation systems based on resume profiling,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 411–423, 2022.
[24] R. Thomas and E. George, “User trust and transparency in AI-assisted hiring,” IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 12–22, 2023.
[25] H. Zhang and C. Liu, “Future trends in AI-based e-recruitment systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 100215–100228, 2023
Published
2026-04-19
How to Cite
Jogar, S., Malali, N., Mirchoni, S., Harakuni, D., & K, P. (2026). Resume Builder and Analyzer. Asian Journal For Convergence In Technology (AJCT) ISSN -2350-1146, 12(1), 77-84. Retrieved from https://asianssr.org/index.php/ajct/article/view/1511

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.