Design and In Silico Evaluation of Coumarin- Triazole Hybrids as EGFR Inhibitors: Molecular Docking and ADMET Analysis

  • Vidya A M Department of chemistry, Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering Bangalore.
  • Meena S Department of chemistry, Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering Bangalore.
  • Sangeeta Benni D Y Patil International University, Akurdi, Pune
  • Vinuta Kamat Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering Bangalore.
  • Mahesh Akki Smt. Kamala and Sri Venkappa M. Agadi College of Engineering & Technology, Lakshmeshwar
Keywords: Coumarin; Triazole; In silico; Molecular docking; ADMET.

Abstract

A series of coumarin-triazole hybrids (1a-1j) were designed and evaluated as Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) inhibitors using molecular docking and in silico pharmacokinetic analysis. Molecular docking was carried out against the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain using the crystal structures PDB 1M17 and PDB 4HJO with Erlotinib serving as the reference inhibitor. The docking investigations displayed that some derivatives had a high binding affinity within the EGFR's ATP-binding region. Compound 1e had the greatest binding affinity, with docking scores of -9.5 kcal/mol (1M17) and -11.9 kcal/mol (4HJO), outperforming the conventional medication in the inactive EGFR configuration. Interaction analysis indicated the formation of hydrogen bonding, π–π stacking, and hydrophobic interactions with key residues such as LYS721, MET742, VAL702 and LEU820, contributing to the stability of the ligand–protein complex. The designed hybrids were further assessed for their pharmacokinetic properties using in-silico ADMET prediction. Most derivatives complied with Lipinski's Rule of Five and Veber's Rule indicating good drug-likeness and oral bioavailability. Furthermore, compounds 1e and 1f have good pharmacokinetic characteristics, moderate solubility, adequate absorption, and non-mutagenic toxicity profiles.

References

[1] H. Sung, J. Ferlay, R.L. Siegel, M. Laversanne, I. Soerjomataram, A. Jemal, F. Bray, Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 71 (2021) 209-249.
[2] B. Global, Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted lifeyears for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study, JAMA oncology, (2017).
[3] G.B.o.D.C. Collaboration, J.M. Kocarnik, K. Compton, F.E. Dean, W. Fu, B.L. Gaw, J.D. Harvey, H.J. Henrikson, D. Lu, A. Pennini, Cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life years for 29 cancer groups from 2010 to 2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019, JAMA oncology, 8 (2022) 420-444.
[4] F. Bray, J. Ferlay, I. Soerjomataram, R.L. Siegel, L.A. Torre, A. Jemal, Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 68 (2018) 394-424.
[5] P. Wee, Z. Wang, Epidermal growth factor receptor cell proliferation signaling pathways, Cancers, 9 (2017) 52.
[6] S. Sigismund, D. Avanzato, L. Lanzetti, Emerging functions of the EGFR in cancer, Molecular oncology, 12 (2018) 3-20.
[7] M.L. Uribe, I. Marrocco, Y. Yarden, EGFR in cancer: signaling mechanisms, drugs, and acquired resistance, Cancers, 13 (2021) 2748.
[8] Y. Du, F. Karatekin, W.K. Wang, W. Hong, G.T. Boopathy, Cracking the EGFR code: Cancer biology, resistance mechanisms, and future therapeutic frontiers, Pharmacological Reviews, 77 (2025) 100076.
[9] A. Zafar, S. Khatoon, M.J. Khan, J. Abu, A. Naeem, Advancements and limitations in traditional anti-cancer therapies: a comprehensive review of surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and hormonal therapy, Discover oncology, 16 (2025) 607.
[10] U. Anand, A. Dey, A.K.S. Chandel, R. Sanyal, A. Mishra, D.K. Pandey, V. De Falco, A. Upadhyay, R. Kandimalla, A. Chaudhary, Cancer chemotherapy and beyond: Current status, drug candidates, associated risks and progress in targeted therapeutics, Genes & diseases, 10 (2023) 1367-1401.
[11] G. Ioele, M. Chieffallo, M.A. Occhiuzzi, M. De Luca, A. Garofalo, G. Ragno, F. Grande, Anticancer drugs: recent strategies to improve stability profile, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, Molecules, 27 (2022) 5436.
[12] S.U. Khan, K. Fatima, S. Aisha, F. Malik, Unveiling the mechanisms and challenges of cancer drug resistance, Cell Communication and Signaling, 22 (2024) 109.
[13] A. Naeem, P. Hu, M. Yang, J. Zhang, Y. Liu, W. Zhu, Q. Zheng, Natural products as anticancer agents: current status and future perspectives, Molecules, 27 (2022) 8367.
[14] C. Cava, I. Castiglioni, Integration of molecular docking and in vitro studies: A powerful approach for drug discovery in breast cancer, Applied Sciences, 10 (2020) 6981.
[15] P. Uppathi, S. Rajakumari, K.V. Saritha, Molecular docking: an emerging tool for target-based cancer therapy, Critical Reviews™ in Oncogenesis, 30 (2025).
[16] Z. Gagic, D. Ruzic, N. Djokovic, T. Djikic, K. Nikolic, In silico methods for design of kinase inhibitors as anticancer drugs, Frontiers in chemistry, 7 (2020) 873.
[17] J. Stamos, M.X. Sliwkowski, C. Eigenbrot, Structure of the epidermal growth factor receptor kinase domain alone and in complex with a 4anilinoquinazoline inhibitor, Journal of biological chemistry, 277 (2002) 46265-46272.
[18] J.H. Park, Y. Liu, M.A. Lemmon, R. Radhakrishnan, Erlotinib binds both inactive and active conformations of the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain, Biochemical Journal, 448 (2012) 417.
[19] H. Krishnapura Nagaraja Rao, V.B. Das, V. Kamat, M. Akki, B. Poojary, S. Gowdar, S. Asthana, M. Pareek, Design, Synthesis, and Fungicidal Activity of a New Class of Thiadiazolylpyrimidine Carboxamide Derivatives Against R. solani Kuhn, Chemistry & Biodiversity, 22 (2025) e01520.
[20] O. Trott, A.J. Olson, AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading, Journal of computational chemistry, 31 (2010) 455-461.
[21] C.A. Lipinski, F. Lombardo, B.W. Dominy, P.J. Feeney, Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings, Advanced drug delivery reviews, 23 (1997) 3-25.
[22] D.F. Veber, S.R. Johnson, H.-Y. Cheng, B.R. Smith, K.W. Ward, K.D. Kopple, Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates, Journal of medicinal chemistry, 45 (2002) 2615-2623.
[23] A. Daina, O. Michielin, V. Zoete, SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules, Scientific reports, 7 (2017) 42717.
Published
2026-04-19
How to Cite
A M, V., S, M., Benni, S., Kamat, V., & Akki, M. (2026). Design and In Silico Evaluation of Coumarin- Triazole Hybrids as EGFR Inhibitors: Molecular Docking and ADMET Analysis. Asian Journal For Convergence In Technology (AJCT) ISSN -2350-1146, 12(1), 315-320. Retrieved from https://asianssr.org/index.php/ajct/article/view/1575

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.