Semantic Web Engineering: Boon or Bane
Abstract
Semantic is the study of meaning of words in a sentence. Semantics help us find words which will fit better in sentence without changing the actual meaning of the sentence. Semantic is very important because, it is necessary to understand the different meanings of words and solves the problem of data overloading while retrieving information from Web. But semantics in ontological world has some shortcomings also. All the advantages and disadvantages related with semantics are collected and explicitly listed out clearly in this paper after a lot of research. Further, graphs have been used to depict the aim of the paper in a coherent manner and visualize the information written focusing on every aspect and need. The study of ontology and semantics in today’s world is considered necessity and ontological axioms have found their use in many fields like medicine, laboratories, mathematical calculation etc. Through this paper, we propose to find if semantic web engineering is a boon or a bane in the field of technology.
References
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/
[2]Reference description of the DAML+OIL language. http://www.daml.org/2001/03/reference.html Frank van Harmelen, Peter F. Patel-Schneider and Ian Horrocks, editors.
[3]Brickley, D., Guha, R.V. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Schema Specification. W3C Proposed Recommendation. March, 2000. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfschema/
[4]Horrocks, I., Fensel, D., Harmelen, F., Decker, S., Erdmann, M, Klein, M. “OIL in a Nutshell”. Proceedings of the 12th European Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling, and Management ({EKAW}'00), R. Dieng
[5] Völker, J., Hitzler, P., & Cimiano, P. (2007, June). Acquisition of OWL DL axioms from lexical resources. In European Semantic Web Conference (pp. 670-685). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg Haarslev, V., & Möller, R. (2000). Optimizing TBox and ABox Reasoning with Pseudo Models. In Description Logics (pp. 153-162).
[6]Eiter, T., Lukasiewicz, T., Schindlauer, R., & Tompits, H. (2004, November). Well-founded semantics for description logic programs in the semantic web. In International Workshop on Rules and Rule Markup Languages for the Semantic Web (pp. 81-97). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
[7]Hofmann, M. (2005, June). Proof-theoretic approach to description-logic. In 20th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS'05) (pp. 229-237). IEEE.
[8]Czarnecki, K., Hwan, C., Kim, P., & Kalleberg, K. T. (2006, August). Feature models are views on ontologies. In 10th International Software Product Line Conference (SPLC'06) (pp. 41-51). IEEE.
[9]Barbieri, D.F., Braga, D., Ceri, S., Della Valle, E., Grossniklaus, M.: C-SPARQL: SPARQL for continuous querying. In: Proceedings of the 18th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2009), Madrid (2009)
[10]Koutsomitropoulos, D., Solomou, G., Pomonis, T., Aggelopoulos, P., & Papatheodorou, T. (2010, April). Developing distributed reasoning-based applications for the Semantic Web. In 2010 IEEE 24th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (pp. 593-598). IEEE.
[11]Hakim, M. M., & Garrett, J. H. (1993). A description logic
approach for representing engineering design standards. Engineering with Computers, 9(2), 108-124.
[12]Vasilecas, O., Kalibatiene, D., & Guizzardi, G. (2009). Towards a formal method for the transformation of ontology axioms to application domain rules. Information Technology and Control, 38(4).
[13]Gilio, A., & Sanfilippo, G. (2013). Conjunction, disjunction, and iterated conditioning of conditional events. In Synergies of soft computing and statistics for intelligent data analysis (pp. 399-407). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
[14]Osborne, F., Motta, E., Mulholland, P.: Exploring scholarly data with rexplore. In: Alani, H., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2013, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8218, pp. 460–477. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).
[15]Frank van Harmelen, Jeen Broekstra, Christiaan Fluit, Herko ter Horst, Arjohn Kampman, Jos van der Meer and Marta Sabou, “Ontology-based Information Visualisation”, Proceedings of the workshop on Visualisation in conjunction with the 5th International Conference on Information Visualisation, London 2001
[16]Vangipuram Radhakrishna, C.Srinivas, (2013)"Document Clustering Using Hibrid XOR Similarity Function For Efficient Software Component Reuse", Procedia Computer Science, Vol.17,pp.121–128.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To ensure uniformity of treatment among all contributors, other forms may not be substituted for this form, nor may any wording of the form be changed. This form is intended for original material submitted to AJCT and must accompany any such material in order to be published by AJCT. Please read the form carefully.
The undersigned hereby assigns to the Asian Journal of Convergence in Technology Issues ("AJCT") all rights under copyright that may exist in and to the above Work, any revised or expanded derivative works submitted to AJCT by the undersigned based on the Work, and any associated written, audio and/or visual presentations or other enhancements accompanying the Work. The undersigned hereby warrants that the Work is original and that he/she is the author of the Work; to the extent the Work incorporates text passages, figures, data or other material from the works of others, the undersigned has obtained any necessary permission. See Retained Rights, below.
AUTHOR RESPONSIBILITIES
AJCT distributes its technical publications throughout the world and wants to ensure that the material submitted to its publications is properly available to the readership of those publications. Authors must ensure that The Work is their own and is original. It is the responsibility of the authors, not AJCT, to determine whether disclosure of their material requires the prior consent of other parties and, if so, to obtain it.
RETAINED RIGHTS/TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Authors/employers retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
2. Authors/employers may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce The Work and for the author's personal use or for company or organizational use, provided that the source and any AJCT copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies AJCT endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
3. Authors/employers may make limited distribution of all or portions of the Work prior to publication if they inform AJCT in advance of the nature and extent of such limited distribution.
4. For all uses not covered by items 2 and 3, authors/employers must request permission from AJCT.
5. Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS
AJCT Copyright Ownership
It is the formal policy of AJCT to own the copyrights to all copyrightable material in its technical publications and to the individual contributions contained therein, in order to protect the interests of AJCT, its authors and their employers, and, at the same time, to facilitate the appropriate re-use of this material by others.
Author/Employer Rights
If you are employed and prepared the Work on a subject within the scope of your employment, the copyright in the Work belongs to your employer as a work-for-hire. In that case, AJCT assumes that when you sign this Form, you are authorized to do so by your employer and that your employer has consented to the transfer of copyright, to the representation and warranty of publication rights, and to all other terms and conditions of this Form. If such authorization and consent has not been given to you, an authorized representative of your employer should sign this Form as the Author.
Reprint/Republication Policy
AJCT requires that the consent of the first-named author and employer be sought as a condition to granting reprint or republication rights to others or for permitting use of a Work for promotion or marketing purposes.
GENERAL TERMS
1. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
2. The undersigned agrees to indemnify and hold harmless AJCT from any damage or expense that may arise in the event of a breach of any of the warranties set forth above.
3. In the event the above work is accepted and published by AJCT and consequently withdrawn by the author(s), the foregoing copyright transfer shall become null and void and all materials embodying the Work submitted to AJCT will be destroyed.
4. For jointly authored Works, all joint authors should sign, or one of the authors should sign as authorized agent
for the others.
Licenced by :
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
